All players shall have their own kingdom. They shall call their kingdom what they wish. No two players may reside in the same kingdom.
I approve.
The rule, as is, is bland, boring, and pointless.
I veto.
My vote no longer counting for anything, I abstain!
abstain
i vote no.
no
Any of you have "informed" reasoning on voting no, besides going with the majority as to not make political enemies?
ignore Lord High Poomba CasualSax's last post. reasons need not be given for how you vote, and the vote thread is not intended for discussion of any sort anyway.
To Quintopia, Leus' Butt Man:
So why didn't you object to the discussion amid voting on rule 302?
To 'Lord High Poomba' CasualSax:
I have already given my idea on the topic in discussion forum, which was negative.
As far as making politcal enemies goes those who are abstaining are being the most politically cautious. Taking a clear stance is acually going to make political enemies.
Seeing as how in its final form, this is as vague and formless as the draft...I'm going to have to vote no. Not that it matters. (:
I think it's already past the 24 hr mark, but I'll still aprove. despite the earlier vetos, I still feel this proposal has SOME merit, and will vote accordingly.