Place a vote here if you would like to rewind to the beginning of Rezantis, Count of Naysaying's turn, and let the game continue.
(In the meantime, Rez, I'd like to talk with you again. IM me tonight if you're online)
I vote yes.
I approve.
I approve.
In the interest of getting this game back on its feet, I agree.
agreed
I will approve, but only if we can first put in a more specific rule on how to vote..that nonsense is ridiculous, and I'm afraid it'll all just happen again.
Fix the cause, then resume the game.
I approve.
And Sax . . . I don't like that idea. We're stepping outside the rules to do this anyway; I'd rather not alter rules and the like while we do so - we can do that once we get back into the game. If my turn is done over, I can suggest another rule (which will involve patching up part of this silliness).
I'll take it on faith that there won't be any silliness from other people too, until we get rules in place to fix it. :)
I don't trust people not to be silly. If we're going to stop play and fix the game, then lets fix it - otherwise, lets call a winner and start a new game.
No ending the game! I've spent a month thinking over the proposal for my turn, and on the eve of it, I don't want to start over :wink:
Sure, I vote yes.
Thats long enough - lets get this game going. Post your proposal already Rizantis. Sax you have had plenty of time to put for some ideas for changes before the game gets roling again.
I agree, this game is at serious risk of fizzling out. Just post the redo thread, Rez.
We have a majority to begin the game, which is required by rule 212 for the next player to commence with thier turn regardless of who the judge is or if the issue is resolved. Rizantis should you choose to redo your turn please post your proposal in the next twenty four hours. If you do not, I will assume you do not wish to redo your turn and I will begin my turn by posting my proposal.
Czar Coal